Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero Australia: Which 4WD Wins?

Few Australian 4WD debates stir up quite as much nostalgia as Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero Australia. These two names have crossed deserts, hauled caravans, tackled corrugated tracks and spent countless weekends covered in enough red dust to permanently change the colour of their wheel arches.

Yet comparing them today is slightly unusual.

The Nissan Patrol remains very much alive. The familiar Y62 Patrol continues to define the big petrol-powered end of the Australian 4WD market, while an all-new Y63 generation has now been announced for Australia. The traditional Mitsubishi Pajero, meanwhile, bowed out after its Final Edition, meaning Australians interested in one are shopping almost exclusively in the used market.

That doesn't make the comparison irrelevant. Quite the opposite.

A good used Pajero can cost dramatically less than a Patrol, uses substantially less fuel and remains a genuinely capable touring wagon. The Patrol counters with enormous V8 performance, more towing capacity, substantially greater dimensions and a level of refinement that feels almost luxurious.

So, which one deserves space in our driveway?

Let's dig in.

Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero Australia at a Glance

Before disappearing down the 4WD rabbit hole, here is the basic picture.

The Y62 Patrol's 5.6-litre V8 produces 298kW and 560Nm, with a 3,500kg braked towing rating and official combined consumption of 14.4L/100km. The final Pajero used Mitsubishi's familiar 3.2-litre turbo-diesel producing 141kW and 441Nm, with a 3,000kg towing capacity and 9.1L/100km combined consumption.

Straight away, we can see these SUVs approach the same problem from very different directions.

The Patrol brings a sledgehammer.

The Pajero brings a well-used multi-tool.

Understanding the Australian Patrol and Pajero Story

Australian buyers have long viewed both vehicles as authentic four-wheel drives rather than soft-road SUVs wearing hiking boots for decoration.

The Patrol built its reputation through generations of tough off-roaders and became especially popular with touring families, caravan owners and people who wanted serious capability without stepping into a ute.

The Pajero followed a slightly different recipe. Mitsubishi combined serious four-wheel-drive hardware with independent suspension and a more compact body, producing something that could travel long distances comfortably without feeling enormous around town.

The Pajero Is Now a Used-Car Proposition

This is the biggest distinction shoppers need to understand.

Mitsubishi's Australian Final Edition marked the end of the traditional Pajero. The last versions retained the long-running 3.2-litre diesel, five-speed automatic, seven-seat cabin, Super Select II four-wheel-drive system and rear differential lock.

There is still a Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in Australia, but despite sharing part of the name, it is a different vehicle.

If we're searching for a genuine Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero comparison, the closest final-generation rival is therefore a used NX Pajero against a Y62 Patrol.

The Patrol Is Entering a New Generation

The comparison is becoming even more interesting because Nissan has announced the Y63 Patrol for Australia.

Australian customer deliveries are expected to begin in early 2027. Instead of the Y62's naturally aspirated V8, every new-generation Patrol will use a 3.5-litre twin-turbo V6 producing 317kW and 700Nm through a nine-speed automatic. Nissan has also announced a 3,700kg braked towing capacity.

So when shopping during this transition period, we may encounter outgoing Y62s, used Y62s and eventually new Y63s.

For a cleaner apples-to-apples used-car discussion, we'll concentrate mainly on the familiar Y62 versus the last Pajero.

Engine Performance: Patrol V8 vs Pajero Diesel

This isn't really a contest on outright numbers.

The Patrol's naturally aspirated 5.6-litre V8 makes 298kW and 560Nm. Press the throttle and the big Nissan moves with an enthusiasm that seems almost ridiculous considering its size.

It doesn't merely accelerate. It gathers itself up and charges.

The Pajero's 141kW and 441Nm 3.2-litre turbo-diesel is far more modest. You won't mistake it for a performance SUV, and the five-speed automatic reminds us that the underlying vehicle belongs to an older engineering era.

But that doesn't mean the Pajero feels useless.

Its diesel delivers the low-speed shove touring drivers want, and the powertrain suits relaxed highway travel and bush work perfectly well. We simply need to adjust our expectations.

Which Engine Feels Better Around Town?

The Patrol wins comfortably for smoothness.

A large naturally aspirated petrol V8 has a fluidity that an older four-cylinder diesel simply cannot replicate. Acceleration is effortless, gear changes are generally relaxed, and merging onto a motorway barely raises the Patrol's pulse.

The Pajero sounds and feels more agricultural.

There is diesel clatter, fewer gears and noticeably less performance when asking for a quick overtake. Yet its narrower dimensions and lower overall mass can make it less intimidating in suburban driving.

Performance Winner: Nissan Patrol

If power matters, the Patrol runs away with this category.

No surprise there.

Fuel Economy: The Pajero Strikes Back

Then we arrive at the petrol station.

Suddenly the giant V8 doesn't seem quite so amusing.

Officially, Nissan lists Y62 Patrol combined consumption at 14.4L/100km, with a large 140-litre fuel tank. Real-world consumption can naturally vary significantly depending on traffic, tyres, modifications, loads and towing.

The final Pajero carries an official combined figure of 9.1L/100km and uses an 88-litre tank.

That difference becomes meaningful quickly.

Imagine travelling thousands of kilometres through regional Australia. The Patrol's appetite isn't merely an occasional inconvenience; fuel becomes a serious part of the touring budget.

Does the Patrol's Huge Fuel Tank Solve the Problem?

It helps with range, but it doesn't solve consumption.

A 140-litre tank means fewer fuel stops than we might expect from something drinking petrol at Patrol rates. That's particularly valuable in remote Australia where the next servo might be a long way down the road.

But filling that tank can hurt.

The Pajero's diesel efficiency makes it easier to justify as an everyday commuter or long-distance touring vehicle when running costs matter more than horsepower.

Fuel Economy Winner: Mitsubishi Pajero

This one isn't particularly close.

Towing Capacity: Is the Patrol Better for Caravans?

Australian buyers love towing, and this category can decide the entire comparison.

The Y62 Nissan Patrol is rated to tow 3,500kg braked, while the final Pajero is rated at 3,000kg.

That 500kg gap sounds simple, but towing isn't merely about the number printed in a brochure.

We must consider vehicle payload, towball mass, accessories, passengers, cargo and overall combination limits. A theoretically legal 3.5-tonne trailer doesn't automatically mean we can fill every seat, load the roof and toss camping equipment into the back without doing the maths.

Why the Patrol Feels More Relaxed When Towing

Raw engine performance makes a difference here.

With 560Nm and nearly twice the Pajero's power, the Patrol has substantially greater performance reserves. Hills, overtaking and accelerating with a heavy trailer feel less demanding.

Its physical size also gives it the planted character many caravan owners appreciate.

The Pajero can tow three tonnes, which is enough for plenty of campers, boats and mid-sized caravans. But once we're routinely hauling something genuinely heavy, the Patrol begins to make more sense.

Towing Winner: Nissan Patrol

For heavy caravanning, we'd choose the Patrol.

Off-Road Capability: Two Very Different Approaches

Now things become more interesting.

The Patrol and Pajero are both legitimate off-roaders, but their engineering philosophies differ.

The Patrol uses an intelligent four-wheel-drive system, electronic rear differential lock and independent double-wishbone suspension front and rear. Nissan lists 273mm of minimum ground clearance for the Y62, while the Ti's approach angle reaches 34.4 degrees.

The final Pajero employs Mitsubishi's famous Super Select II system, giving drivers selectable full-time four-wheel drive together with high- and low-range functionality, a locked centre differential and rear differential lock.

Why Super Select II Still Deserves Respect

Super Select is one of the Pajero's best features.

We can use four-wheel drive on sealed surfaces when desired and still have proper low-range gearing when the track becomes ugly. That flexibility helped make the Pajero an Australian touring favourite.

Mitsubishi also gave the vehicle serious geometry. Final Edition figures included a 36.6-degree approach angle, 25-degree departure angle and 700mm wading depth.

It may look relatively civilised, but underneath the family-wagon appearance is a vehicle that understands what happens when bitumen ends.

The Patrol's Advantage in Difficult Terrain

The Patrol responds with ground clearance, torque and an exceptionally capable chassis.

Its size is both a strength and weakness.

Wide tracks, dunes, rocky climbs and open outback country suit it beautifully. Tight forest trails? That's where nearly two metres of body width starts feeling like we're guiding a refrigerator between trees.

The Pajero's smaller footprint can make technical terrain easier to negotiate.

Off-Road Winner: Draw

We'd give the Patrol the edge for serious power-hungry terrain and the Pajero points for manoeuvrability and simplicity.

Neither is pretending to be a four-wheel drive.

Size and Manoeuvrability

Numbers tell the story clearly.

The Y62 Patrol measures 5,175mm long and 1,995mm wide, with a 3,075mm wheelbase.

The final Pajero is approximately 4,900mm long and 1,875mm wide.

A 120mm difference in width might not look dramatic on paper.

Try parking both in an older Australian shopping centre.

Then we'll talk.

Living With a Patrol in the City

The Patrol's high seating position gives excellent visibility, and cameras help tremendously, but physics remains physics.

It's huge.

Narrow underground parking bays, tight driveways and inner-city streets demand concentration. Once we're used to it, the Patrol becomes manageable, but nobody will mistake it for a Mazda CX-5.

Why the Pajero Feels Easier

The Pajero sits in a friendlier middle ground.

It's still a proper seven-seat four-wheel drive, yet its dimensions make supermarket trips and suburban streets noticeably less intimidating.

For owners who spend Monday to Friday in town before heading bush on Saturday morning, that matters.

Urban Practicality Winner: Mitsubishi Pajero

Smaller doesn't always mean better, but around town it often does.

Interior Space and Family Practicality

Here the Patrol's massive footprint begins paying dividends.

Depending on grade, the outgoing Australian Patrol accommodates seven or eight occupants, while the Pajero offers seven seats. Nissan lists the Ti with eight-seat capacity and Ti-L with seven.

More importantly, the Patrol feels broad inside.

There is genuine shoulder room, generous second-row accommodation and a sense that the cabin was designed for big families taking big trips.

The Pajero is spacious for its exterior dimensions, but we shouldn't expect it to match the Patrol's sheer cabin volume.

Which Has the Better Third Row?

For frequent three-row use, the Patrol is generally the more convincing family bus.

The Pajero's third row works, particularly for children, but its packaging reflects the limitations of a smaller, older platform.

With those rear seats folded, however, the Pajero becomes impressively useful. The final model offered around 1,069 litres of luggage volume with the third row folded, expanding to 1,789 litres with the rear seating stowed.

Family Space Winner: Nissan Patrol

For a large household, the Nissan's extra size finally feels like a feature rather than a parking problem.

Ride Comfort on Australian Roads

Long-distance comfort is critical when destinations can sit hundreds of kilometres apart.

The Y62 Patrol built much of its reputation on an unexpectedly plush ride. Independent suspension at both ends and Nissan's Hydraulic Body Motion Control help manage such a large body.

It tends to flow along highways with the lazy confidence of a luxury SUV.

The Pajero also uses independent suspension and was unusually sophisticated for a serious off-roader when its engineering architecture first appeared.

But age catches up with everything.

Compared with the Patrol, the Pajero's cabin refinement, drivetrain isolation and overall road manners feel from another generation.

Corrugations and Rough Touring Roads

Things tighten up once the asphalt disappears.

The Pajero remains wonderfully competent on gravel and rough touring tracks. Its comparatively manageable dimensions inspire confidence, and the diesel powertrain suits slower travel.

The Patrol feels heavier and more substantial.

On broad corrugated outback roads it can be superb, but owners should remember that tyres, suspension condition, pressures and vehicle load often influence real-world ride quality as much as the badge on the bonnet.

Comfort Winner: Nissan Patrol

The Pajero is comfortable enough.

The Patrol feels expensive.

Interior Technology and Cabin Design

The gap becomes obvious when climbing between vehicles.

Even the outgoing Y62 is newer-feeling than the Pajero's basic architecture, although parts of the Patrol's cabin have themselves aged during its long production life.

The final Pajero received a seven-inch infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, while higher grades added luxuries such as heated seats, leather trim and premium audio.

Yet switchgear, displays and dashboard design betray its age.

The Patrol feels more substantial and upscale, particularly in higher specifications.

The Incoming Y63 Changes Everything

Anyone comparing these vehicles in late 2026 should also know how dramatically the next Patrol moves forward.

Nissan says the Australian Y63 will include widescreen displays, Google built-in services, additional connected technology and significantly upgraded cabin refinement.

Comparing an incoming Y63 with a final-generation Pajero therefore isn't simply comparing two models.

We're effectively comparing two different eras of 4WD design.

Technology Winner: Nissan Patrol

An easy Patrol victory.

Reliability and Long-Term Ownership

This category requires more nuance than declaring one vehicle "bulletproof."

Both have earned loyal Australian followings, yet both can become expensive if maintenance has been neglected.

With an older Pajero, service history matters enormously. Diesel injectors, intake systems, cooling components, suspension wear, transmission servicing and general evidence of hard off-road use all deserve inspection.

On a Y62 Patrol, buyers should similarly investigate complete service history, suspension condition, cooling performance, driveline behaviour and signs of poorly executed aftermarket modification.

A modified 4WD isn't automatically bad.

A badly modified 4WD often is.

Why Condition Matters More Than Badge

At this stage of their lives, two identical-looking Pajeros can be completely different ownership propositions.

Nissan Patrol vs Navara: Which Nissan 4x4 Makes More Sense?

One might have spent its existence cruising highways with meticulous annual servicing.

Another might have crossed every muddy bog hole between Cairns and Cape York while towing 2.8 tonnes.

The same logic applies to used Patrols.

A pre-purchase inspection from someone who understands four-wheel drives is money well spent.

Reliability Verdict: Buy the History, Not the Reputation

We'd rather own an immaculate, properly maintained example of either vehicle than a neglected example of the theoretically "more reliable" one.

Running Costs and Servicing

The Pajero regains momentum here.

Fuel is the obvious difference. With official consumption of 9.1L/100km against the Y62's 14.4L/100km, the Mitsubishi has a substantial advantage before we even reach the workshop.

Tyres, brakes and some other consumables can also become expensive on a large, heavy Patrol.

But the Pajero has its own problem: age.

As the fleet gets older, preventative maintenance matters more. Rubber components deteriorate, suspension wears, electrical connections age and previous owners leave their fingerprints—sometimes literally and sometimes in the form of questionable wiring behind the dashboard.

Which One Is Cheaper to Own?

For most normal-distance drivers, we'd expect the Pajero to be cheaper.

Its lower fuel consumption alone can create substantial savings for anyone covering 15,000 or 20,000 kilometres each year.

For occasional recreational use, however, the Patrol's thirst may matter less.

If the vehicle only leaves the garage for holidays, weekends and towing duties, some buyers will happily trade fuel economy for V8 performance.

Running-Cost Winner: Mitsubishi Pajero

The spreadsheet favours Mitsubishi.

The heart may still favour the Nissan.

Touring Range and Remote-Area Travel

Australia has a way of making fuel tanks feel smaller.

Remote travel is therefore about more than the official litres-per-100km number.

The Pajero's diesel efficiency is extremely useful. Diesel availability across remote regions is another practical consideration, particularly for owners already running diesel-powered touring equipment.

Meanwhile, the Patrol carries a gigantic 140-litre tank.

Its thirsty engine needs much of that capacity, but the result can still be useful touring range under the right conditions.

Which Would We Take Across the Outback?

Either, provided it had been prepared properly.

A mechanically sound Pajero makes a wonderfully sensible remote-tourer because it balances capability, efficiency and manageable size.

The Patrol is the more luxurious choice and has enormous performance reserves, especially when heavily loaded or towing.

Our decision would depend more on what we're carrying than the route printed on the map.

Payload and Heavy Touring Setups

Here's where 4WD comparisons often become misleading.

Owners see a massive vehicle and assume they can keep adding accessories indefinitely.

Bullbar. Winch. Roof rack. Fridge. Drawers. Dual battery. Long-range touring gear. People. Towball download.

Suddenly, hundreds of kilograms have disappeared.

The Y62 Patrol Ti's official kerb mass sits at roughly 2,786kg against a 3,500kg GVM, while the heavier Ti-L has less available payload. Pajero payload varies by specification, with a GLS Final Edition example listed around 700kg.

Heavy caravan owners should calculate their complete setup rather than assuming the Patrol automatically wins simply because it has the higher tow rating.

Used-Car Value: This Is Where the Pajero Becomes Tempting

For many shoppers, the strongest Pajero argument has nothing to do with approach angles.

It's price.

The Final Edition originally started from $54,990 before on-road costs for the GLX, rising to $63,490 for Exceed. Today, we're dealing with used-market pricing that varies according to kilometres, specification, location and condition.

The Patrol occupies another financial category entirely.

Even before considering fuel, buying the Nissan generally requires significantly more money.

Bang for Buck

A good Pajero can deliver genuine low-range four-wheel drive, seven seats, diesel economy, three-tonne towing capability and excellent touring credentials without requiring Patrol-sized money.

That's difficult to ignore.

The Patrol gives us more vehicle—more engine, more interior room, more towing capability and more luxury—but we absolutely pay for it.

Value Winner: Mitsubishi Pajero

For the budget-conscious adventurer, the Pajero remains one of Australia's most interesting used 4WD propositions.

Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero for Camping

Imagine we're packing for a week away.

If it's two adults, a couple of children, moderate camping equipment and no enormous caravan, the Pajero makes tremendous sense. It's easier to manoeuvre, efficient by old-school 4WD standards and capable enough to access places most owners realistically visit.

Start adding six people, substantial luggage, a large trailer and long highway sections and the Patrol begins stretching its legs.

It's the difference between carrying luggage in a backpack and throwing it into a shipping container.

The Patrol simply offers more breathing room.

Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero for Daily Driving

This category is surprisingly close.

The Patrol is dramatically smoother and more powerful.

The Pajero is dramatically easier to feed.

If our daily routine involves broad suburban roads and easy parking at home and work, the Patrol's size isn't necessarily an issue.

If we're navigating crowded city streets, tight apartment garages or old shopping centres, the Pajero is the less stressful companion.

And if we're commuting substantial distances every day, its superior fuel economy becomes impossible to ignore.

Daily Driver Winner: Mitsubishi Pajero

Not because it's nicer.

Because it's easier to justify.

Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero for Towing

For regular heavy towing, our answer flips firmly toward Nissan.

The Patrol offers another 500kg of rated braked towing capacity, far greater power and a broader torque spread from its V8.

Owners of smaller campers may never need that advantage.

Owners of large caravans probably will appreciate it.

And looking forward, the Y63 pushes the capability envelope further, with Nissan announcing 3,700kg braked towing capacity, 317kW and 700Nm.

Towing Winner: Nissan Patrol

No debate for seriously heavy trailers.

Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero for Off-Road Touring

This might be the most fascinating part of the entire comparison.

The Patrol has more power and clearance.

The Pajero is smaller and more economical.

Both provide proper low-range capability.

Both offer rear differential locks in relevant Australian specifications.

The Patrol can feel unstoppable when space isn't an issue.

The Pajero feels nimble and intelligently packaged.

For dune driving, open desert and loaded touring, we'd lean Patrol.

For narrower tracks and budget-conscious expedition travel, we'd happily take the Pajero.

Off-Road Touring Winner: Depends on the Trip

And sometimes "it depends" really is the correct answer.

Safety: Age Matters

Safety technology evolves quickly, and the Pajero's age is particularly apparent here.

Although the final models offered traditional safety equipment, the architecture couldn't accommodate some newer active-safety systems that had become commonplace by the end of its production life. Contemporary coverage specifically noted the absence of technology such as autonomous emergency braking.

That matters for family buyers.

The outgoing Patrol isn't the newest design on the road either, but buyers assessing overall family safety should compare the exact model years and grades rather than relying solely on an old crash-test star rating.

The upcoming Y63 moves the Patrol much further into the modern era.

What About the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport?

We should address the elephant wearing a Mitsubishi badge.

The Pajero Sport is not the direct continuation of the traditional Pajero's engineering formula.

It is a separate, ute-based SUV that remains available in Australia and currently uses a 2.4-litre turbo-diesel, eight-speed automatic and Mitsubishi Super Select 4WD-II in relevant grades. Mitsubishi lists up to 3.1 tonnes of braked towing capacity.

If we're shopping new rather than used, Patrol vs Pajero Sport becomes an entirely different comparison.

The Pajero Sport is substantially cheaper and smaller than the Patrol, while the Patrol sits much closer to full-size premium 4WD territory.

What Changes With the New Y63 Nissan Patrol?

A lot.

The all-new Patrol effectively stretches the distance between these two nameplates even further.

Nissan has announced a six-grade Australian Y63 range beginning at $98,990 MSRP before on-road costs, with the first customer deliveries planned for early 2027. Every version receives a 3.5-litre twin-turbo petrol V6 developing 317kW and 700Nm, a nine-speed automatic and 3,700kg maximum braked towing capacity.

There's also significantly more cabin technology and an Australian PRO-4X variant aimed at serious off-road use.

That means somebody shopping for a new Patrol and somebody shopping for a used Pajero aren't simply cross-shopping two competing models.

They're considering fundamentally different ownership philosophies.

Who Should Buy a Nissan Patrol?

The Patrol makes the most sense when our priorities revolve around space, power, towing and refinement.

It's particularly compelling for families travelling with plenty of equipment or caravan owners who routinely need substantial towing performance.

We'd favour the Patrol when fuel cost isn't the primary concern and we actually have a use for its immense capabilities.

Buying one simply because "bigger is better" can get expensive.

Buying one because we regularly tow, carry passengers and travel serious distances makes far more sense.

Who Should Buy a Mitsubishi Pajero?

The Pajero is the rational adventurer's choice.

We'd consider one when we want genuine off-road ability and seven-seat practicality without paying Patrol money or accepting Patrol fuel consumption.

Its age means finding the right vehicle takes patience.

A clean Pajero with documented maintenance history can be enormously appealing.

A cheap, neglected example can swallow the money we thought we'd saved.

That distinction matters.

Which Is Better for Australian Conditions?

Australia isn't one environment.

Someone towing a 3.3-tonne caravan through central Queensland has different needs from a Melbourne family camping in the Victorian High Country.

A Perth commuter driving 80km every weekday has different priorities again.

That's why there is no universally superior choice.

The Patrol is objectively more powerful, larger and capable of towing more.

The Pajero is more efficient, easier to manoeuvre and potentially far cheaper to buy.

The real question isn't which vehicle is better.

It's which compromise bothers us less.

Final Verdict: Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero Australia

So, where do we land in the Nissan Patrol vs Mitsubishi Pajero Australia debate?

If money were removed from the equation and we wanted one vehicle for serious towing, family road trips, comfortable long-distance touring and occasional demanding off-road work, we'd choose the Nissan Patrol.

Its V8 performance is effortless. The cabin is enormous. The 3,500kg towing capacity gives us extra flexibility, and its road manners make long journeys remarkably relaxing.

But value changes the calculation dramatically.

The Mitsubishi Pajero remains an excellent used 4WD for Australians who prioritise diesel economy, manageable dimensions, dependable touring capability and a substantially lower purchase price.

Think of it this way.

The Patrol is the big touring yacht. It carries more, pulls harder and surrounds us with more comfort, but keeping the tanks full costs money.

The Pajero is the tough expedition boat. Smaller, simpler and less glamorous, perhaps—but efficient enough to keep travelling when our wallet starts asking difficult questions.

For heavy towing and maximum family space, Patrol wins.

For value and fuel efficiency, Pajero wins.

For serious Australian adventure?

We'd happily trust either—provided we bought the right example.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a Nissan Patrol better than a Mitsubishi Pajero?

The Nissan Patrol is better if we need substantial power, a larger cabin and heavier towing capability. The Mitsubishi Pajero can be the better purchase when fuel economy, manageable dimensions and used-car value are more important. The right choice depends largely on how we intend to use the vehicle.

Which is better off-road, Pajero or Patrol?

Both are genuine four-wheel drives. The Patrol offers excellent ground clearance, substantial power and robust off-road hardware, while the Pajero combines low-range gearing, Super Select II, a rear differential lock and smaller dimensions. The Patrol suits open terrain and heavily loaded touring particularly well, whereas the Pajero's more compact footprint can be useful on tight tracks.

Which uses less fuel, Nissan Patrol or Mitsubishi Pajero?

The Mitsubishi Pajero comfortably wins on official fuel consumption. The final 3.2-litre diesel Pajero was rated at 9.1L/100km combined, while the Y62 Patrol's 5.6-litre V8 is rated at 14.4L/100km. Actual consumption varies with load, driving style, terrain, modifications and towing.

Can a Mitsubishi Pajero tow as much as a Nissan Patrol?

No. The final Mitsubishi Pajero has a maximum braked towing capacity of 3,000kg, compared with 3,500kg for the Y62 Nissan Patrol. Nissan has announced an even higher 3,700kg braked towing capacity for the incoming Y63 Patrol.

Toyota Yaris Cross Models Australia: Complete Guide to Every Grade

Can you still buy a new Mitsubishi Pajero in Australia?

Not the traditional Pajero discussed here. Mitsubishi ended the model with the Final Edition, so buyers now generally need to search the used market. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport remains a separate model in the Australian range.