Renault Captur vs Ford Puma Australia: Which Small SUV Is Better?

The Renault Captur vs Ford Puma Australia comparison is a little different from the usual small-SUV showdown. These two European crossovers once competed directly for Australian buyers wanting something compact, stylish and more interesting than the usual suspects. Today, however, the battleground has shifted largely to the used-car market.

Ford discontinued the petrol-powered Puma in Australia during 2024, while Renault subsequently put the Captur nameplate on ice locally and replaced it with the larger Symbioz in 2026.

That doesn't make the comparison irrelevant. Quite the opposite.

Used examples of both cars can now represent significantly better value than they did when sitting under dealership lights with new-car price tags attached. And because their personalities are surprisingly different, choosing between them isn't simply about finding whichever one costs less.

The Captur is the more muscular and versatile package. Its turbocharged four-cylinder engine delivers considerably more torque, its rear-seat arrangement is clever, and its cabin has a distinctive French flavour.

The Puma takes another path. It feels smaller, lighter and more playful. Ford essentially sprinkled some Fiesta magic over a crossover body, creating one of the livelier small SUVs of its era.

So which one deserves our money?

Let's put them side by side.

Renault Captur vs Ford Puma Australia at a Glance

For a representative comparison, we'll focus primarily on Australian-market examples from around the 2023–2024 period.

Australian Capturs used a 1.3-litre turbocharged petrol four-cylinder developing 113kW and 270Nm, while the Puma relied on a smaller 1.0-litre turbo three-cylinder producing 92kW and 170Nm. Both sent their power to the front wheels through seven-speed dual-clutch transmissions.

Immediately, we can see the philosophical divide.

The Puma prioritises lightness and efficiency. The Captur brings more muscle.

Are the Renault Captur and Ford Puma Still Sold in Australia?

This is the first thing Australian shoppers need to understand.

Ford Puma Australian availability

Ford announced in February 2024 that it was discontinuing the petrol-powered Puma in Australia, with the final arrivals expected around May of that year. The company initially planned to introduce the electric Puma Gen-E but later cancelled its Australian launch too.

That means anyone shopping for the familiar 1.0-litre petrol Puma today will essentially be shopping used.

Renault Captur Australian availability

The Captur lasted longer in Renault's plans, although Australian supply became thin. Just 169 were delivered during 2024, followed by only a handful in 2025.

By 2026 Renault had officially shifted direction. The new Renault Symbioz arrived to effectively replace the Captur in the local range.

Interestingly, the Captur hasn't entirely vanished from Australia in spirit. The newer Mitsubishi ASX sold locally is closely related to the European Renault Captur.

What does that mean for buyers?

It means this comparison now makes the most sense when looking at:

• used Renault Captur models;
• used Ford Puma models;
• demonstrators or remaining dealer stock, where any still exists;
• buyers deciding which European compact SUV will age better.

And that changes what matters.

A few thousand dollars in original list price becomes less important. Condition, service history, specification and kilometres suddenly matter much more.

Engine Performance: Captur Wins on Muscle

If we simply examine the numbers, the Renault walks into this round with broader shoulders.

The Australian Captur's 1.3-litre turbocharged four-cylinder produces 113kW and 270Nm.

The Puma's 1.0-litre turbocharged three-cylinder generates 92kW and 170Nm.

That's a 100Nm torque advantage for the Renault.

And 100Nm is hardly pocket change in a little crossover.

How the Captur feels

The Captur's strong mid-range torque makes it feel more substantial than its dimensions suggest.

Ask for acceleration when merging onto a motorway and there's enough shove available that we don't have to plan the manoeuvre three suburbs in advance.

The engine works particularly well once the turbocharger is awake and the transmission has selected the right ratio.

It's not a hot hatch disguised as an SUV, but there's genuine punch.

The Captur's hidden advantage

It's effortless torque.

Imagine two cyclists climbing the same hill. The Puma is the lighter rider spinning enthusiastically through the gears. The Captur is the rider with stronger legs who simply pushes harder.

For highway overtaking, carrying passengers or tackling hilly terrain, we'd prefer the Renault powertrain.

Ford Puma Performance: Less Power, More Personality

Numbers only tell us so much.

The Puma's little three-cylinder engine is one of those powertrains that feels more enthusiastic from behind the wheel than its specifications suggest.

Its 92kW output won't knock anyone's hat off, yet the engine has character. There is that familiar three-cylinder thrum when working hard, and the relatively compact dimensions contribute to the feeling that we're driving something closer to a hatchback than a traditional SUV.

That's precisely where the Puma finds its personality.

Which SUV feels faster?

The Captur generally feels stronger.

But the Puma often feels more energetic.

There's an important distinction.

The Renault gives us stronger acceleration through torque. The Ford encourages us to participate more.

If our priority is effortless performance, Captur.

If our priority is having a little grin while threading through a twisting road, Puma.

Driving Experience: The Puma Strikes Back

Here's where Ford earns serious points.

Among small SUVs from this period, the Puma developed a reputation for being unusually enjoyable to drive. Contemporary Australian testing similarly praised its steering and chassis, describing it as one of the most entertaining vehicles in its class.

That shouldn't be terribly surprising considering Ford knew a thing or two about making small cars handle.

Puma steering and cornering

The steering feels relatively direct, the body is controlled through corners, and the car doesn't behave like it would rather be somewhere else whenever the road bends.

The ST-Line takes this further with sports-oriented suspension tuning.

Turn into a roundabout and there's an agility here that some rivals simply don't possess.

It's not a Puma ST—we never officially received that hotter version in Australia—but there's enough DNA from Ford's better-handling hatchbacks to keep enthusiastic drivers interested.

Captur ride and handling

The Captur approaches the road with different priorities.

Its setup feels more mature than mischievous.

The Renault is composed, comfortable and secure. In everyday driving, that may actually make it the better all-round companion.

Where the Puma whispers, “Take the long way home,” the Captur says, “Relax, we've got this.”

Our handling verdict

Ford Puma wins.

For drivers who actually care about steering feel and cornering behaviour, we'd choose the Ford.

Fuel Economy: Ford Puma Has the Advantage

The Puma's smaller engine gives it an obvious advantage at the bowser.

Ford quoted combined fuel consumption of approximately 5.3L/100km for Australian versions of the Puma.

The Renault Captur was rated at 6.6L/100km combined.

That difference works out to 1.3L/100km on paper.

How meaningful is that difference?

Over 15,000km:

• Puma at 5.3L/100km uses roughly 795 litres;
• Captur at 6.6L/100km uses roughly 990 litres;
• theoretical difference: around 195 litres.

Real-world numbers will naturally depend on traffic, temperature, driving style and journey length.

Both engines also prefer premium unleaded petrol, so neither is necessarily the cheapest small SUV to fuel simply because it has a small engine.

Still, the Puma gets our efficiency point.

Transmission: Dual-Clutch Versus Dual-Clutch

This comparison contains an interesting coincidence.

Both vehicles use seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmissions.

Dual-clutch gearboxes can change ratios quickly and efficiently once we're moving, but they don't always imitate the buttery behaviour of a conventional torque-converter automatic at parking speeds.

Driving them around town

Owners considering either model should specifically test:

• crawling through traffic;
• reverse parking;
• hill starts;
• low-speed roundabouts;
• stop-start manoeuvres;
• accelerating from almost stationary.

Why?

Because those situations expose the characteristics of a dual-clutch transmission far better than a five-minute blast down a motorway.

We wouldn't reject either car simply because it uses a DCT. We would, however, make transmission behaviour an essential part of any used-car inspection.

Interior Design: French Flair or Ford Familiarity?

Step into the Captur and there's immediately more visual theatre.

Renault designed its cabin to feel youthful and slightly unconventional. Depending on specification, there's a portrait-oriented central touchscreen, configurable displays, contrasting trim and a centre-console layout that looks more adventurous than we'd expect in an affordable crossover.

The Puma is more conventional.

But conventional isn't automatically bad.

Renault Captur cabin

Higher Captur grades are particularly appealing.

Australian Intens models, for example, offered equipment including:

• 9.3-inch infotainment display;
• satellite navigation;
• surround-view camera;
• heated front seats;
• powered driver's seat;
• rear USB ports;
• privacy glass;
• upgraded interior trim.

The design gives the impression that somebody in Renault's studio was actually allowed to have fun.

Ford Puma cabin

The Puma cockpit is straightforward and driver-focused.

ST-Line versions added a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, sports steering wheel and distinctive interior detailing, while ST-Line V examples added features such as upgraded lighting, a power tailgate, proximity entry and a B&O audio system.

Still, the basic architecture doesn't feel as dramatic as the Renault's.

Cabin verdict

For visual appeal: Captur.

For simple familiarity: Puma.

We'd give the overall interior round to Renault.

Technology and Infotainment

This category depends heavily on trim level.

Later Australian Capturs received wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto across the range, while upper specifications gained the larger portrait-style infotainment display.

The Ford also brought smartphone connectivity, FordPass functions and wireless phone charging, but its smaller infotainment screen looked increasingly modest as rivals moved toward larger displays.

Which technology package ages better?

The Renault looks newer.

That's important in the used-car market.

Renault Captur vs Skoda Kamiq Australia: Which Small European SUV Makes More Sense?

A vehicle might mechanically be only three or four years old, but an undersized infotainment screen can make its cabin feel like it belongs to another generation.

Neither system is perfect, though.

If technology matters heavily to us, we'd test both interfaces rather than judging them from photographs.

Rear Seat Space: Captur Is the Family-Friendlier Choice

The Captur has another trick up its sleeve: a sliding rear bench.

That means we can shuffle the compromise between passenger space and luggage space depending on what we're carrying.

It's surprisingly clever.

Need additional rear legroom?

Slide accordingly.

Need more boot capacity?

Move the bench forward.

The Puma's rear seats are considerably more conventional and were one of the Ford's weaker areas. Contemporary testing noted limited rear-seat amenities and relatively tight accommodation.

Which would we choose with children?

Captur.

Especially if child seats or growing teenagers are regularly involved.

The Puma works as a five-seater on paper, but it makes most sense as a car for singles, couples or smaller households that use the back seats occasionally.

The Renault is more adaptable.

Boot Space: Surprisingly Close

Small SUVs sometimes look adventurous outside before revealing a luggage compartment large enough for approximately one backpack and an optimistic attitude.

Fortunately, neither of these does that.

Renault quoted 422 litres of normal boot capacity for the Captur, expanding to as much as 536 litres when accounting for the underfloor area and sliding the rear bench forward. With the rear seats folded, capacity rises to 1275 litres.

Puma figures vary slightly according to measurement conventions and specifications, with published Australian data around 376 litres plus underfloor storage, or roughly 410 litres when the additional compartment is included.

Captur boot advantages

Renault's sliding rear bench gives it tremendous flexibility.

We can effectively decide whether today's priority is humans or luggage.

Puma boot advantages

Ford's underfloor storage solution is genuinely useful.

Dirty shoes, wet swimming gear and muddy equipment can be kept away from the carpeted main luggage area.

Boot verdict

It's close, but Captur wins for versatility.

Exterior Size and City Driving

These SUVs occupy remarkably similar footprints.

The 2024 Captur measured:

• 4227mm long;
• 1797mm wide;
• 1567mm tall;
• 2639mm wheelbase.

Depending on variant, the Puma was around 4186–4207mm long, 1805mm wide and roughly 1550mm tall, with a 2588mm wheelbase.

So the Ford is slightly shorter, while the Renault has the longer wheelbase.

Around Melbourne, Sydney or Brisbane

Either makes sense.

Their footprints are small enough that crowded shopping-centre car parks aren't terrifying.

The Puma's slightly smaller feel and agile steering make it particularly good for urban manoeuvring.

The Captur fights back with parking assistance technology on better-equipped versions.

There's no wrong answer here.

Safety: Trim Level Matters

Both cars originally carried five-star ANCAP ratings based on 2019 European crash testing, although historical ratings shouldn't automatically be interpreted as equivalent to a five-star score under today's stricter testing protocols.

Standard Captur safety equipment included features such as:

• autonomous emergency braking;
• pedestrian and cyclist detection;
• lane-departure warning;
• lane-keeping assistance;
• traffic-sign recognition;
• reversing camera;
• front and rear parking sensors.

Zen and higher Capturs added equipment such as adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.

The Puma also included AEB, lane-keeping assistance, traffic-sign recognition, reversing camera and rear parking sensors, but some useful driver-assistance features—including adaptive cruise and blind-spot monitoring—were bundled into an optional Park Pack on certain grades.

Used-car safety buying tip

Never assume that two Pumas of the same year have identical safety equipment.

Check the actual car.

Option packs matter.

For that reason, we'd particularly seek a Puma fitted with the Park Pack.

Renault Captur vs Ford Puma Reliability

This is where used-car buying requires more nuance than simply looking at a reliability score online.

Neither vehicle should be purchased blindly.

Both combine:

1. turbocharged engines;
2. direct modern electronics;
3. dual-clutch automatic transmissions;
4. European engineering;
5. relatively sophisticated driver-assistance systems.

That doesn't mean they're unreliable. It means service history becomes extremely important.

What to check on a used Captur

We'd examine:

• complete scheduled servicing;
• smooth DCT engagement;
• infotainment operation;
• warning lights;
• parking cameras and sensors;
• keyless-entry functions;
• evidence of collision repair;
• tyre wear across all four wheels;
• remaining factory warranty, if applicable.

What to check on a used Puma

We'd pay attention to:

• transmission behaviour from cold;
• engine performance;
• service documentation;
• driver-assistance systems;
• infotainment connectivity;
• power tailgate operation where fitted;
• suspension noises;
• tyres and wheel damage, particularly on larger-wheel variants.

Service history beats badge reputation

A carefully maintained Captur is preferable to a neglected Puma.

A meticulously serviced Puma is preferable to an abused Captur.

Once cars enter the used market, individual condition begins to outweigh broad brand stereotypes.

Servicing Costs and Intervals

There's an interesting difference here.

Renault specified servicing for the Captur every 12 months or 30,000km, whichever came first.

Ford's Puma interval was 12 months or 15,000km.

That gives the Renault an obvious advantage for high-mileage motorists.

Someone travelling 25,000km annually could potentially remain on annual servicing with the Captur while crossing the Ford's kilometre threshold considerably earlier.

Factory warranty

When new, both were backed by five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranties in Australia.

Used buyers should calculate remaining warranty from the vehicle's original registration date rather than assuming coverage based solely on model year.

Original Pricing and Today's Used-Car Value

When new, these cars weren't bargain-basement SUVs.

The 2023 Captur range included Life, Zen, Intens and R.S. Line variants, with published pricing extending from roughly the low-$30,000 region into the low-$40,000s before on-road costs.

The Puma similarly stretched from its base model through ST-Line and ST-Line V specifications.

Depreciation has changed the conversation dramatically.

Current used-market guides show many 2023 examples sitting substantially below their original retail prices, although actual asking prices naturally depend on kilometres, condition, specification and location.

Depreciation can become our friend

The first owner probably doesn't enjoy seeing this.

The second owner might.

Buying a two- or three-year-old European small SUV after its largest early depreciation hit can unlock features that would otherwise require considerably more money in a new vehicle.

Still, a low purchase price is only attractive if the car has been properly maintained.

Ford Puma Trim Levels: Which One Should We Buy?

Australian shoppers generally encountered three Puma grades:

Puma

Even the base model covered the fundamentals well.

For value-focused shoppers, it deserves serious consideration.

Puma ST-Line

The ST-Line adds visual and dynamic flavour, including sportier suspension tuning and interior touches.

This is arguably the enthusiast's sweet spot.

Puma ST-Line V

The ST-Line V brings more luxury and convenience equipment.

Features included 18-inch wheels, upgraded lighting, privacy glass and additional premium equipment.

Our Puma sweet spot

We'd look hardest at a well-optioned ST-Line, particularly one fitted with the Park Pack.

It preserves much of the Puma's sporty appeal without requiring us to automatically pay top-spec money.

Renault Captur Trim Levels: Which Is Best?

The Australian Captur range evolved over time, but key grades included Life, Zen, Intens and R.S. Line.

Captur Life

Life gives us the fundamentals but misses some of the equipment that makes the Captur particularly appealing.

Captur Zen

This is where things become interesting.

Zen added adaptive cruise control, keyless entry, climate control, wireless phone charging, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert on later Australian models.

That's a strong package.

Captur Intens

Intens introduces considerably more interior luxury and technology, including the large vertical touchscreen, surround-view cameras and heated seats.

Our Captur sweet spot

Zen for value. Intens for indulgence.

If the used-price difference isn't huge, we'd happily move up to an Intens.

Renault Captur vs Ford Puma for City Driving

For inner-city life, the Puma narrowly wins.

Why?

Its compact footprint, responsive chassis and economical 1.0-litre engine make it feel perfectly suited to urban environments.

Parking is easy, fuel consumption is relatively low and the Ford has an eagerness that turns ordinary errands into something slightly less ordinary.

Winner: Ford Puma

By a small margin.

Renault Captur vs Ford Puma for Families

Here the pendulum swings strongly toward Renault.

Renault Captur vs Opel Mokka Australia: Which Small SUV Makes More Sense?

The Captur gives us:

• more flexible rear seating;
• strong boot versatility;
• longer wheelbase;
• punchier engine;
• useful upper-grade safety features;
• greater suitability for carrying passengers regularly.

The Puma's rear compartment simply isn't its strongest card.

Winner: Renault Captur

Comfortably.

Renault Captur vs Ford Puma for Long Trips

For long-distance touring, we'd lean toward the Captur.

The extra 100Nm of torque is valuable when the car is loaded with passengers and luggage.

Its 48-litre fuel tank is also larger than the Puma's 42-litre tank, although the Ford compensates with lower claimed fuel consumption.

The Captur generally feels like the more substantial vehicle on a lengthy journey.

But there's a caveat.

Drivers covering enormous annual kilometres should remember that Renault's service interval was up to 30,000km compared with Ford's 15,000km kilometre interval.

Winner: Renault Captur

Renault Captur vs Ford Puma for Driving Fun

No suspense here.

Puma.

Ford managed to give a practical crossover some genuine personality.

The steering, suspension tuning and relatively lightweight character make it the vehicle we'd grab for a winding Sunday road.

The Renault isn't bad.

The Ford is simply better at playing.

Winner: Ford Puma

Which One Looks Better?

Now we're entering wonderfully subjective territory.

The Captur wears its French identity proudly.

Curves, contrasting colours and distinctive lighting give it a fashionable personality without becoming cartoonish.

The Puma is arguably more athletic.

Its raised headlights and rounded nose create an instantly recognisable face, while ST-Line models look particularly sharp.

Our preference

We'd call it a draw.

The Renault looks chic.

The Ford looks sporty.

Choose your flavour.

Major Advantages of the Renault Captur

After looking at the entire package, the Captur's strongest arguments are straightforward:

• considerably more torque;
• flexible sliding rear bench;
• generous luggage capacity;
• attractive cabin design;
• longer 30,000km kilometre servicing interval;
• excellent equipment in Zen and Intens grades;
• comfortable everyday driving;
• strong family practicality.

It feels like the more complete small SUV.

Major Advantages of the Ford Puma

The Puma answers with a completely different skill set:

• lower official fuel consumption;
• entertaining handling;
• compact exterior dimensions;
• responsive steering;
• clever boot storage;
• characterful three-cylinder engine;
• strong urban usability;
• attractive ST-Line versions.

It's the driver's choice of the pair.

Reasons We Might Avoid the Renault Captur

No car gets a free pass.

Potential Captur disadvantages include its greater fuel consumption, relatively small Australian sales footprint and the fact Renault has now retired the Captur nameplate locally.

Australian Captur sales dropped to just 169 units in 2024, seven in 2025 and zero during 2026 up to the latest available reporting.

Lower sales volume doesn't automatically make ownership problematic, but resale demand and model familiarity can matter to some shoppers.

We'd also make sure we're comfortable with the DCT's low-speed behaviour before purchasing.

Reasons We Might Avoid the Ford Puma

The Puma's biggest weakness is practicality behind the front seats.

Rear-seat accommodation isn't nearly as convincing as the car's clever luggage compartment.

Power is also modest beside the Captur.

Then there's model discontinuation. Puma sales collapsed as stock disappeared following Ford's withdrawal of the vehicle from Australia.

Again, discontinuation doesn't suddenly make the car bad.

It simply becomes another consideration when thinking about long-term ownership and resale.

Renault Captur vs Ford Puma Australia: Scorecard

Let's simplify everything.

The scorecard tells us something important.

The Puma wins several emotional categories.

The Captur wins more practical ones.

Which Should We Buy Used?

If both cars sit in front of us with identical mileage, similar condition and comparable prices, we'd choose the Renault Captur for most buyers.

It's simply more versatile.

The more powerful engine, flexible rear bench, generous boot and spacious cabin make it easier to live with when circumstances change.

Bought a dog?

Useful.

Had a child?

Useful.

Suddenly need to transport three adults and luggage?

Still useful.

When we'd choose the Ford Puma instead

We'd absolutely take the Puma if we're primarily driving alone or as a couple and genuinely enjoy driving.

The Puma manages something unusual in the small-SUV category: it doesn't feel as though practicality drained every drop of personality from the car.

That's valuable.

Cars don't have to be appliances.

Best Choice for Different Australian Buyers

Choose the Captur if you value:

• performance;
• rear-seat flexibility;
• luggage room;
• highway comfort;
• family practicality;
• interior style;
• equipment.

Choose the Puma if you value:

• fuel economy;
• handling;
• steering feel;
• compact dimensions;
• sporty styling;
• urban driving;
• driving enjoyment.

And if you're buying purely on price?

Buy the better car, not the cheaper badge.

At used-car age, condition matters enormously.

We'd happily pay $1,500 more for a vehicle with immaculate servicing, excellent tyres, two keys and a clean history rather than save that money upfront on an uncertain example.

What Should We Check Before Buying Either SUV?

Before money changes hands, we'd use a simple checklist:

1. Verify complete service history.
2. Start the engine from cold.
3. Test the transmission at very low speeds.
4. Check for warning lights.
5. Test every infotainment function.
6. Connect Apple CarPlay or Android Auto.
7. Operate all parking cameras and sensors.
8. Inspect tyres for uneven wear.
9. Check wheels for kerb damage.
10. Look underneath for leaks.
11. Confirm both keys are supplied.
12. Check registration and ownership history.
13. Confirm whether factory warranty remains.
14. Arrange an independent mechanical inspection.
15. Compare several examples before committing.

That last step matters.

When a model is no longer sold new, used pricing can vary wildly between sellers.

Don't fall in love with the first shiny one.

Conclusion: Renault Captur or Ford Puma?

The Renault Captur vs Ford Puma Australia contest doesn't produce one universal winner because these two compact SUVs appeal to slightly different people.

If we want the more powerful, versatile and family-friendly vehicle, the Renault Captur gets our vote.

Its 1.3-litre turbo engine has a meaningful torque advantage, its sliding rear bench is genuinely useful, its boot is flexible and higher specifications feel surprisingly premium for such a compact vehicle.

But don't dismiss the Ford Puma.

For an individual or couple who values driving enjoyment over maximum rear-seat practicality, the Puma may actually be the smarter purchase. It's economical, agile and refreshingly fun.

Think of them like two pairs of shoes.

The Captur is the comfortable pair we could wear almost anywhere.

The Puma is the pair that makes us want to go outside.

Neither model currently holds the same place in the Australian new-car market that it once did: Ford discontinued the petrol Puma during 2024, and Renault has since replaced the Captur locally with the Symbioz.

But as used cars?

They're arguably more interesting now than they were when new.

Depreciation has done some of the negotiating for us.

Find a clean example, insist on excellent service history and choose according to how we'll actually use the car.

For practicality, Captur wins.

For fun, Puma wins.

For most Australian buyers who need one little SUV to do almost everything, we'd take the Renault Captur.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is the Renault Captur better than the Ford Puma?

For buyers prioritising engine performance, passenger flexibility and luggage capacity, we'd generally consider the Renault Captur the better all-rounder. Its 1.3-litre turbo engine produces 113kW and 270Nm, comfortably exceeding the Australian Puma's 92kW and 170Nm.

The Ford Puma is the more entertaining car to drive, however, and uses less fuel according to official combined figures.

2. Which is more economical, Ford Puma or Renault Captur?

The Ford Puma wins on claimed fuel consumption. Australian Puma models were rated at approximately 5.3L/100km, compared with 6.6L/100km for the Renault Captur.

Actual consumption will depend on driving conditions and driver behaviour.

3. Which has the bigger boot, Renault Captur or Ford Puma?

The Renault Captur officially offered 422L behind the rear seats, with up to 536L available when using the underfloor space and sliding the rear bench forward.

The Puma provides roughly 410L when its useful underfloor compartment is included, making it surprisingly practical despite its smaller dimensions.

4. Can you still buy a new Ford Puma in Australia?

The familiar petrol-powered Ford Puma was discontinued in Australia during 2024. Ford also subsequently cancelled plans to introduce the electric Puma Gen-E locally.

Consequently, Australian shoppers interested in this generation of Puma will predominantly be looking at the used market.

5. Is the Renault Captur still sold in Australia?

Not as a current Renault model. Renault has put the Captur nameplate on ice locally and introduced the Symbioz as its replacement in the Australian range in 2026.

The Captur design does live on indirectly in Australia, however, because the newer Mitsubishi ASX is closely related to the European Renault Captur.

Renault Captur vs Toyota Yaris Cross Australia: Which Small SUV Makes More Sense?